Personal and Institutional Factors Affecting Physiotherapist Performance in Nusa Tenggara Barat, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26911/Abstract
Background: Physiotherapist performance is an important indicator in determining the quality of medical rehabilitation services, influenced by the interaction of personal and institutional factors. This study aims to analyze the influence of personal factors (motivation, formal and non-formal education) and institutional factors (leadership and work environment) on physiotherapist performance.
Subjects and Method: This study used a quantitative approach with a cross-sectional design. The subjects consisted of 183 physiotherapists in West Nusa Tenggara (NTB) Province. Data collection was conducted using a questionnaire that had been tested for validity and reliability. Independent variables included motivation, formal education, non-formal education, leadership, and work environment. The dependent variable was physiotherapist performance. Data analysis included bivariate analysis using Spearman's rho and multivariate analysis using path analysis with STATA.
Results: Motivation (b = 0.44; 95% CI = 0.34 to 0.54; p < 0.001), work environment (b = 0.40; 95% CI = 0.29 to 0.51; p < 0.001), and formal education (b = 0.22; 95% CI = 0.13 to 0.32; p < 0.001) had a direct and significant influence on physiotherapist performance. Work environment (b = 0.40; 95% CI = 0.28 to 0.53; p < 0.001), leadership (b = 0.15; 95% CI = 0.03 to 0.28; p = 0.016), and non-formal education (b = 0.31; 95% CI = 0.19 to 0.44; p < 0.001) had an indirect effect on performance through motivation. Leadership also had an indirect effect on performance through work environment (b = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.34 to 0.56; p < 0.001). The model showed good fit (Chi-square = 9.92; p = 0.105; RMSEA = 0.066; CFI = 0.99; TLI = 0.97; SRMR = 0.024).
Conclusion: Motivation, work environment, and formal education have a direct influence on physiotherapist performance, while leadership and non-formal education have an indirect influence through motivation and work environment as mediators.
Keywords:
Physiotherapist, work performance, motivation, leadership, path analysisHow to Cite
References
Aditya E, Yusuf S, Nani Y (2024). The influence of leadership, work motiva-tion, and personality on the perform-ance of health workers at the Watopute Community Health Center, Muna Regency in 2023. JAKK-UHO, 5(2).
Bakker AB, Demerouti E (2007). The Job Demands–Resources model: State of the art. J Manag Psychol, 22(3): 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683-940710733115
Bimantara AI, Widagdo B, Marsudi M (2021). Effect of training on employee performance with work motivation as an intervening variable. Jamanika, 1(4): 317–326. https://doi.org/10.2-2219/jamanika.v1i4.19446
Catio M (2020). The influence of leadership and work environment on employee performance at PT Suksesindo Pratama in Jakarta. J Ilm Adm Publik, 10(1): 243. https://doi.org/10.26858-/jiap.v10i1.14468
Dolonseda HP, Watung SR (2020). The impact of work environment and work ethic on employee performance. Public Policy, 1(2): 288–297. https://-doi.org/10.51135/publicpolicy.v1.i2.p288-297
Fajriah Y, Muis N, Yanti R, Halim A (2021). The influence of motivation, ability and experience on employee perform¬ance. J Resour Econ, 4(1).
IFI (2024). Indonesian Physiotherapy Asso¬ciation. https://www.ifi.or.id/
Ministry of Health (2024). Guidelines for fulfilling professional credit units (SKP) for health workers through the SATUSEHAT SDMK platform. Jakarta: Ministry of Health Republic of Indonesia.
Khoiri M, Oktavia NR (2019). The influence of leadership on employee perform-ance at the Election Supervisory Agen¬cy of South Jakarta. J Ilm Demokrasi, 19(1): 80–98. https://doi.org/10.21-009/jimd.v19i01.12954
Mangkunegara AP (2016). Manajemen sumber daya manusia perusahaan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Maratis J (2022). The influence of empowering leadership, work engage-ment, and professionalism on physio-therapist performance in Jakarta. Jakarta: Universitas Negeri Jakarta.
Matondang NA, Sugiarto A (2025). The effect of education level on employee performance with competence as an intervening variable. Int J Manag Econ Account, 3(1): 1930–1940. https://¬doi.org/10.61306/ijmea
Panjaitan EH (2024). The impact of trans-formational leadership on employee performance: The mediating role of work motivation. Indones J Educ Res, 10: 1039–1047.
Purwanto A, Adiati MP (2021). Leadership style and its influence on organizational performance. J Manag Innov, 12(1): 1–10.
Putra Y, Rojali M, Novia M (2024). Analysis of workload and work stress through motivation on employee performance. Proc Conf, 5(2): 262–279. https://¬doi.org/10.4108/eai.25-5-2024.23494¬39.
Rahmilah M (2025). The influence of edu-cation level on employee performance at Hospital X, Makassar. Indones J Sci Health Res, 2(3): 103–107. https://-doi.org/10.69930/jrski.v2i3.411
Ridwan M, Sitanggang HM, Anas A (2023). Employee performance and the influ¬ence of leadership style and work environment. J Manag Bisnis, 10(2): 649–661. https://doi.org/10.33096/j-mb.v10i2.626
Robbins SP, Judge TA (2022). Organiza-tional behavior. Pearson.
Ryandini TP, Nurhadi M (2020). The influence of motivation and workload on hospital employee performance. Indones Nurs J Educ Clin, 5(1): 8. https://doi.org/10.24990/injec.v5i1.276
Saripah R, Yanuarti M (2024). The effect of training and work motivation on employee performance at PT Padma Karya Prima. J Ilm Swara Manajemen, 4(2): 389–400. https://doi.org/10.3-2493/jism.v4i2.36416
Shakya NR (2024). Barriers and facilitators for strengthening physiotherapy services in Nepal. BMC Health Serv Res, 24: 876.
Tamara L, Usman B, Kurbani A, Heryati H (2024). The influence of education level and work experience on employee performance through job satisfaction. J Media Wahana Ekon, 21(1): 156–168. https://doi.org/10.31851/jmwe.v21i1.12855
Wibowo (2014). Manajemen kinerja. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Yustinus A (2016). Analysis of patient satisfaction with physiotherapy services at Dr Sardjito Hospital. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.
