Evaluation of the Implementation of Clinical Accreditation Standards in Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia

Authors

  • Sari Tyaswikaning Aji Master's Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
  • Tonang Dwi Ardyanto Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
  • Argyo Demartoto Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26911/

Abstract

Background: Clinical accreditation is an effort to improve the quality of healthcare services, but its implementation in primary healthcare facilities still faces various challenges, particularly in ensuring quality sustainability. This study aims to evaluate the implementation of clinical accreditation standards and analyze their impact on service quality based on the 5M management approach.

Subjects and Methods: This study used a qualitative evaluative approach, encompassing four levels: input, process, output, and outcome evaluation. Data were collected through in-depth inter-views with key informants, field observations, and document studies at four clinics in Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia. The study was conducted from September to December 2025. Data validity was triangulated by creating a descriptive analysis.

Results: Accreditation implementation has improved aspects of service structure and processes, including organizational governance, availability of SOPs, increased human resource understanding, and arrangement of service facilities and documentation. However, implementation is still dominated by administrative fulfillment and has not been fully integrated into a sustainable quality management system. Impacts on outcomes, such as patient satisfaction and quality culture, are beginning to be seen, but are not yet supported by data-based quality indicators and systematic evaluation. Key supporting factors include leadership commitment, availability of basic resources, and regulatory support, while inhibiting factors include limited human resources, workload, a suboptimal monitoring system, and the perception of accreditation as an administrative burden.

Conclusion: Implementation of accreditation acts as an initial step in improving service quality, but is not enough to guarantee sustainability without strengthening the monitoring system, indicator-based evaluation, and internalization of a quality culture

Keywords:

clinical accreditation, service quality, patient safety, sustainable quality management

Published

16-05-2026

Downloads

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Evaluation of the Implementation of Clinical Accreditation Standards in Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia. (2026). Journal of Health Policy and Management, 11(2), 161-171. https://doi.org/10.26911/

How to Cite

Evaluation of the Implementation of Clinical Accreditation Standards in Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia. (2026). Journal of Health Policy and Management, 11(2), 161-171. https://doi.org/10.26911/

References

Alkhenizan A, Shaw C (2019). Impact of accreditation on the quality of health-care services: a systematic review. Ann Saudi Med. 39(4): 221–230. https://¬doi.org/10.4103/0256-4947.83204

Araujo CAS, Siqueira MM, Malik AM (2020). Hospital accreditation impact on patient satisfaction and quality of care. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 33(6): 423–435. https://doi.org/10.-1093/intqhc/mzaa090.

Braithwaite J, Greenfield D, Westbrook JI, Pawsey M, Westbrook MT, Gibberd RW, et al. (2017). Health service accre¬ditation as a predictor of clinical and organizational performance. BMJ Open. 7: e017512.

Devkaran S, O'Farrell PN (2015). The impact of hospital accreditation on clinical documentation compliance. Int J Qual Health Care. 27(6): 483–489. http://-dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005240

Firdaus R, Khaerani S, Wijaya N (2025). Digital transformation of health infor-mation systems towards connected and patient-centered health services. Econ Digit Bus Rev. 6(2): 1045–1055. https://ojs.stieamkop.ac.id/index.php/ecotal/article/view/2481.

Flodgren G, Gonçalves-Bradley DC, Pomey MP (2016). External inspection of compliance with standards for improved healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (12): CD008992.

Greenfield D, Pawsey M, Hinchcliff R, Moldovan M, Braithwaite J (2012). The standards of healthcare accre-ditation standards: a review. Int J Qual Health Care. 24(2): 149–157. https://¬doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-329.

Hidayat A (2021). The influence of facilities and systems on achieving health facility accreditation standards. J Kesehat Masy. 15(2): 123–130.

Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia (2022). Regulation of the Minister of Health Number 34 of 2022 concerning Accreditation of Public Health Centers, Clinics, Health Laboratories, and Blood Transfusion Units. Jakarta: Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia.

Ng GKB, Leung GKK, Johnston JM, Cowling BJ (2013). Factors affecting imple¬mentation of accreditation programs in hospitals. J Health Organ Manag. 27(5): 573–587. https://doi.org/10.1-2809/hkmj134063

OECD (2019). Health at a glance 2019: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Pomey MP, Contandriopoulos AP, François P, Bertrand D (2010). Accreditation as a tool for organizational change. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 23(7): 675–689. https://doi.org/10.1108/09526-860410532757

Shaw CD, Groene O, Mora N, Sunol R (2014). Accreditation and ISO certifi-cation: do they explain differences in quality management? Int J Qual Health Care. 26(1): 21–27. https://-doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzq054

World Health Organization (2022). Quality of care in primary health services. Geneva: WHO.